- Preface
- Preface to Second Edition
- Moral Discourse and Moral Philosophy
- An Example of Moral Discourse
- Is There a Connection between Moral Philosophy and First-Order Moral Discourse?
- Moral Discourse and Theories of Meaning
- The Referential Theory
- Simplest Form of the Theory
- A More Sophisticated Version of the Theory
- Wittgenstein’s “Picture Theory”
- The Referential Theory and Moral Discourse
- The Verificationist Theory
- Logical Positivism
- The Verification Principle and Moral Discourse
- The Causal, or Psychological, Theory
- Two Senses of Meaning
- The Psychological Theory and Moral Discourse
- Meaning as Use
- The Later Wittgenstein and the Need to Look at the Use to Which Language Is Put
- Depth Grammar, Forms of Life, and Moral Discourse
- J. L. Austin and What We Do With Words
- Meaning, Illocutionary Force, and Moral Discourse
- The Referential Theory
- The Intuitionist Theory
- Moore, and the Rejection of Ethical Naturalism
- Good as Indefinable
- The Naturalistic Fallacy
- Moore’s Predecessors
- Did Mill Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy?
- Are Moore’s Arguments Good Ones?
- Is Ethical Naturalism Defensible?
- The Intuitionism of Prichard and Ross
- H. A. Prichard
- W. D. Ross
- A Predecessor of Prichard and Ross
- The Claim to Know By Moral Intuition
- Moore, and the Rejection of Ethical Naturalism
- The Emotivist Theory
- The Rejection of Nonnaturalism
- Wittgenstein and the Logical Positivists
- The Dynamic Character of Moral Discourse
- Stevenson’s Account of Emotivism
- Origins of Emotivism
- Stevenson’s Three Features of Moral Discourse
- Disagreement in Attitude and Belief
- The Meaning of Moral Judgments
- Stevenson’s Patterns of Analysis and the Methodology of Moral Argument
- Criticism of Emotivism
- Moral Effects of Emotivism
- Two Confusions
- Is Stevenson’s Self-Consistent?
- Stevenson’s Psychological Theory of Meaning
- Meaning and Suggestion
- Truth and Falsity
- Validity and Invalidity
- Does Stevenson’s Theory Fit the Facts?
- The Rejection of Nonnaturalism
- Prescriptivism
- The Rejection of Emotivism
- Reasons and Causes
- Meaning and Perlocutionary Force
- Hare’s Account of Prescriptivism
- Prescriptivity
- Supervenience
- Value-Judgments and Imperatives
- Universalizability
- How and Why Are Value Judgments Universalizable?
- What Makes a Value Judgment Moral?
- Logical Relations
- Prescriptivity
- Criticism
- Criticism: Prescriptivity
- Is Prescriptivism Plausible?
- How Far Does Hare’s Prescriptivism Go beyond Emotivism?
- Criticism: Universalizability
- Some Misunderstandings
- Situation Ethics
- Act- and Rule-Utilitarianism
- MacIntyre’s Criticism
- Is the Universalizability Thesis True but Trivial?
- The Universalizability Thesis and Utilitarianism
- Is the Universalizability Thesis a Moral Principle?
- Criticism: Logical Relations
- Neustics and Phrastics
- Hare’s Rules
- Value-Words and Speech-Acts
- Kind and Levels of Meaning
- Criticism: Prescriptivity
- The Rejection of Emotivism
- The Derivation of “Ought” from “Is”
- Hume on “Is” and “Ought”
- New Interpretation No. 1
- New Interpretation No. 2
- Which Interpretation is Correct?
- Contemporary Attempts to Deduce “Ought” from “Is”
- Searle’s Derivation of “Ought” from “Is”
- Criticism of Searle
- Is Searle Successful?
- Gewirth’s Derivation of “Ought” from “Is”
- Gewirth’s Reason and Method
- Gewirth’s Derivation
- Criticisms of Gewirth
- Searle’s Derivation of “Ought” from “Is”
- Hume on “Is” and “Ought”
- Some Further Forms of Descriptivism
- Two Assumptions of Prescriptivism Rejected
- Description and Evaluation
- Criteria and Choice
- Morality Grounded in Human Wants
- “Ought” Taken to Mean “Wants”
- “Wants” as Providing a Conclusive Reason for “Ought”
- Mrs. Foot’s Earlier View
- Criticism of Mrs. Foot’s Earlier View
- Mrs. Foot’s Later Views
- Comparison of Morality and Etiquette
- Criticism of Mrs. Foot’s Later Views
- Morality Grounded in Man’s Telos
- P. T. Geach on the Meaning of “A Good Man”
- “Good” as an Attributive Adjective
- “Man” as a Functional Noun
- Criticism of Geach
- Stuart Hampshire on the Connection Between Attributive and Predicative Uses of “Good”
- The Nature of the Connection
- How the Uses are Connected in Aristotle
- The Difficulties Hampshire finds in Aristotle’s Ethics
- A. C. Macintyre on “Man” as a Functional Noun
- Aristotelian Analysis of Morality
- Fact and Value
- The Communal Nature of the Telos
- Critical Comment
- Basil Mitchell on the Connection Between Morality and Religion
- Concluding Comment
- P. T. Geach on the Meaning of “A Good Man”
- Morality Grounded in Tradition
- Agreement in Judgments
- Tradition and Innovation
- Public Norms
- Two Assumptions of Prescriptivism Rejected
- Anti-Utilitarianism and the “Two-Level” Theory
- Neo-Intuitionism’s Attack on Utilitarianism
- Three Examples of Neo-Intuitionism
- Two Lines of Criticism
- Is Utilitarianism Self-Defeating?
- Defence of Utilitarianism
- Hare’s Recent Moral Philosophy
- The Constraint of “Logic and the Facts”
- Fanaticism and Utilitarianism
- Summary So Far
- Linguistic and Moral Intuitions
- Criticisms of Hare on “Logic and the Facts”
- The “Two-Level” Theory
- The Relationship between the “Two Levels” of Moral Thinking
- Freedom and Reason
- The Constraint of “Logic and the Facts”
- Neo-Intuitionism’s Attack on Utilitarianism
Array ( [_edit_lock] => Array ( [0] => 1576970881:1 ) [_edit_last] => Array ( [0] => 1 ) [ISBN] => Array ( [0] => 9780333357736 ) [ASIN] => Array ( [0] => 0333357736 ) [shop] => Array ( [0] => "15089"|2000|£9.75 ) )